MI, PA, WI JUDICIAL VOTE FRAUD UPDATE: Are Democrat House and Senate Candidates Trapped in a No-Win Situation?

MI, PA, WI JUDICIAL VOTE FRAUD UPDATE: Are Democrat House and Senate Candidates Trapped in a No-Win Situation?

 

By Doug Ross

 

As if Democrats weren’t already fomenting enough chaos with their brownshirts — Antifa, BLM and the like — the Supreme Courts of several battleground states have decided to pile on. In PennsylvaniaMichiganMinnesota and Wisconsin, Democrat activists dressed in black robes have fundamentally rewritten state election laws. Among their various revisions to these crucial laws:

 

  • Mail-in ballots can be received up to seven (7) days after the election and still be counted
  • These ballots can be missing postmarks and still be counted
  • The signature on the ballot doesn’t even have to match with that of the registered voter
  • And, as a bonus, they have banned the Green Party from the ballot to prevent erosion of the Biden vote

 

All of these illegal proclamations directly contravene state law and are simply naked, partisan attempts to swing the election.

 

More importantly, they are in clear violation of the Constitution.

 

Article I, Section 4

 

…The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof…

 

The Judicial branch — at any level of government — has no role in deciding the times, places and protocols for Congressional elections.

 

Democrat Activists on the Pennsylvania Supreme Court Who Are Trying to Launch a Coup Against the President in 2020: Christine Donohue, Democrat. David Wecht, Democrat. Kevin M. Dougherty, Democrat. Debra Todd, Democrat. Max Baer, Democrat. May their names live in infamy for all times.

 

Which means that even if the illegal vote harvesting scam promoted by certain state Supreme Courts at the presidential level goes unchallenged, the clear text of the Constitution prevents any other federal office-holder from being counted if it is in violation of state law.

 

As for the presidential election, the Constitution is equally clear, as Mark Levin has repeatedly pointed out.

 

Article II, Section 1

 

…Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector…

 

Once again, the legislature is wholly responsible for directing the manner of presidential elections.

 

Rogue Democrat partisans disguised as judges have no role in dictating the times, places and manner of elections for any federal officeholder.

 

But Article 1, Section 4 of the Constitution clearly dictates that any down-ticket federal elections must conform explicitly to the legislative body’s instructions. Perhaps Democrat activists disguised as judges have helped entrap their own party’s Congressional candidates in a web of deception.

 

From directorblue.blogspot.com

Categories: