Editor’s Note:  This in-depth report should be read by all American’s to see how truly un-American, perhaps the ‘real’ worst governors in America are!  I can’t imagine living in Washington State and putting up with such heinous destruction of citizenship.  Diane L. Gruber’s articles in this report span a few years and will assuradly make you wonder how so many democrats can buy into this insanity.

List of Articles

1. Destroying Citizenship: Washington State Takes The Lead
2. Washington’s 2026 Legislature: Democrats Plan To Destroy Sheriffs’ Independence
3. Outlawing Elected Sheriffs In Washington. You Must Stop HB 1399
4. Washington State’s Plan To Decertify Elected Sheriffs
5. What Is A Constitutional Sheriff And Why Do YOU Need One?
6. Defunding Constitutional Sheriffs: Another Scheme To Disenfranchise Voters
7. Bill Pending: ARMED Illegal Aliens Policing AMERICANS In Washington State
8. It Is Now Illegal To Make Illegals Feel Uncomfortable
9. Democrats Create “Super Citizens”
10.  Who Is Paying For Aliens’ Food, Shelter, Cellphones, Clothes?  YOU ARE!!!

1. Destroying Citizenship: Washington State Takes The Lead

 

 

Diane L. Gruber  March 20, 2024

 

The more foreign nationals Biden illegally imports, the more benefits & privileges they are given, the more American citizenship is degraded. The State of Washington has taken the lead with House Bill 1889, which was signed by Democrat Governor Jay Inslee last week. Beginning July 1st, illegal aliens residing in Washington can obtain professional licenses using their Employer Identification Number (EIN). NOTE: legal immigrants have always been able to obtain said licenses.

 

Heretofore, to obtain any type of employment license an applicant had to provide a Social Security number. These “super citizens” will get to keep more of their earnings than Americans are allowed to keep, because they will not be paying Social Security and Medicare taxes, nor will their employers. This provides an incentive for employers to hire illegals instead of Americans. As time goes on, this will, no doubt, hasten the collapse of these already weakened programs for the elderly.

 

This new statute also wipes out the citizenship requirement that was required for some professions, like optometry, private investigators and notaries, which had required applicants to be United States citizens to qualify for licensure. Indeed, it removes all barriers to illegal aliens obtaining all kinds for licenses and certificates, from lawyer to hairdresser, from doctor to electrician, from driver to CPA, from plumber to architect, from realtor to security guard . . . . Any professional license or certificate of accomplishment issued by the State of Washington will be given to foreign nationals residing in America illegally.

 

“This bill will open doors for careers in teaching, health care, accounting and many other professions to those who are ready to join the Washington workforce,” Inslee said at the bill signing.

 

OF SECURITY GUARDS AND LAWYERS

 

Speaking of security guards: Will they be given licenses to carry firearms? Each legislative session for the last decade plus, Extreme Left Democrats (who own the state) have chipped away at our Second Amendment Rights. Chip. Chip. Chip. Indeed, at the same time Inslee signed this “super citizen” bill into law, he signed three bills making it harder for Free Washingtonians to exercise their right to bear arms. Will illegal aliens who obtain licenses as security guards be given permits to carry firearms?

 

Speaking of lawyers: This bill was signed just two days after the Washington Supreme Court lowered the standards for obtaining a license to practice law in the state. The stated purpose is to license more “marginalized” people. Illegal aliens are becoming less & less “marginalized” every day. Indeed, if this trend continues, it will be Americans who will become “marginalized.”

 

SANCTUARY STATEWashington is a sanctuary state which signs up foreign nationals, legal & illegal, for Obamacare upon arrival. As of March 2021 the numbers show that 3.9% of Washington’s residents are illegal aliens, or roughly 300,000. This number does not include Biden’s Guests (or, as Biden calls them “newcomers”). Inslee’s office will not release current numbers, but it is estimated that at least 75,000 “newcomers” have arrived since the southern border was opened in January 2021. By the way, some sneak across the northern border which the state shares with British Columbia, Canada.

 

It’s difficult to estimate how many people might pursue jobs under the new licensing statute. However, representatives of several local universities told lawmakers the bill would benefit their “undocumented” students. University of Washington Tacoma Campus’ representative said the school enrolls roughly 200 “undocumented” students which is about 5% of the school’s student body.

 

Washington State is beginning the creation of a country where more & more residents are not citizens, thereby degrading & eventually eliminating the concept of American citizenship. Will this spread to other states? Where will America be twenty, thirty years from now?

2. Washington’s 2026 Legislature: Democrats Plan To Destroy Sheriffs’ Independence

Caption: In April sheriffs from across Washington State testified before the US House Judiciary Committee regarding the negative impact of the state’s “sanctuary” laws on public safety and federal cooperation. My sheriff, Pacific County Sheriff Daniel Garcia, in the cowboy hat, can be seen in this photo with Pam Bondi. Pictured here are Adams County Sheriff Dale Wagner and his Undersheriff Adolfo Coronado, Ferry County Sheriff Ray Maycumber, Pend Oreille County Sheriff Glenn Blakesly, Pierce County Sheriff Keith Swank, Benton County Sheriff Tom Croskrey and his Undersheriff John Law. Many more Sheriffs across the state would have attended if not for the extremely short notice of the opportunity. The hearing specifically focused on the Keep Washington Working Act. This deadly state law prevents local law enforcement from assisting ICE in arresting criminal foreign nationals.

 

By Diane L Gruber Jan 22

 

Elected sheriffs are more independent and more effectively represent, and understand, the values of the people in their counties than sheriffs appointed by Washington’s governor or some other political body. Democrats HATE independent public officials! THAT is why Democrats in the State of Washington have been scheming to reduce the authority of our 39 sheriffs for YEARS and to defund them. At least three bills have been filed by Democrats designed to continue chip, chip, chipping away at yet one more freedom that We The People enjoy: Our freedom to choose OUR sheriff.

 

HOUSE BILL 1399

 

This bill was filed last year, but did not make it out of committee. HB 1399 would change the entire landscape of the election process for county sheriffs and replace them with appointed sheriffs who are accountable only to politicians, not to We The People. You can tell your two state representatives and your state senator to vote “NO” by clicking on this link.

 

A careful reading of this 20 page bill reveals many troubling ways our overlords in Olympia will prevent the voters of each county from electing the sheriff of their choice. I will name just a few:

 

1) Write-in candidates will no longer allowed. I find this very troubling because, in 2022, Pacific County got rid of a sheriff who was widely disliked for his failure to provide effective policing in many areas of our huge land mass county & his lackadaisical attitude, and elected the write-in, Daniel Garcia, with 61% of the vote. The public is extremely happy with him. This bill is sneaky. It does not state that write-in candidates have been outlawed. That would be too honest for Democrats. The public might notice. They merely put so many pre-filing requirements in place that a would-be candidate would need to start the pre-filing process with the State at least a year in advance, probably longer. AND the pre-filing time frame will be completely controlled by our overlords in Olympia. See Sections 8 and 10 of HB 1399.

 

2) When the sheriff’s position is vacant (with all the new laws, there will be ever more vacancies), the county commissioners will appoint the sheriff. See Section 9 of HB 1399. [NOTE: Left-leaning county commissioners dislike ELECTED sheriffs. Pacific County Commissioners removed two functions from our very popular sheriff in just his first two years in office.] Democrats in Olympia wanted to give the power to appoint all sheriffs to the governor, but they knew there would be an uproar from We The People, so this is the next best thing in their minds. Chip, chip, chipping away at the county voters’ right to choose their sheriff, one bill at a time.

 

3) Section 8 further narrows the pool of candidates who will be allowed to run and We The People will be allowed to elect as our county sheriff. It requires candidates to have “at least two years regular, uninterrupted, full-time law enforcement agency employment involving enforcement responsibilities with a government law enforcement agency.” Let’s think about that for a minute: In the bigger counties the sheriff’s duties are managerial, not patrolling. In other words, although he/she may carry a gun, they don’t use it and don’t arrest people. Voters elect sheriffs from the pool of neighbors whom they trust. They may or may not meet the “two year” requirement. Keep in mind, our overlords in Olympia will interpret this requirement, not the voters. For example, what if the candidate has ten years of experience, but that was five years ago?

 

The legislative summary of the bill, sponsored by Democrats, can be found here.

 

SENATE BILL 5974

 

Senate Bill 5974 would allow the State to removed a constitutionally elected sheriff and replace him/her with a Democrat stooge. Before being sworn in, an elected sheriff must first get the approval of an “appointing authority.” I don’t need to tell my readers that NO constitutional sheriff will ever be sworn in again.

 

SENATE BILL 5066

 

I call this bill “tightening the noose.” The attorney general already had authority to investigate for wrong doing law enforcement officers throughout the state but, apparently, Democrat AG Nick Brown is not satisfied. Senate Bill 5066 tightens the attorney general’s authority to investigate and effectively shut down a law enforcement office, including a duly elected sheriff’s office. The attorney general will have even more power to weaken the sheriff’s authority through the appointment of a non-citizen board which could decertify a duly elected sheriff and remove him from office. There are foreign nationals on other AG boards, so it is likely they would sit on this board. This bill also allows the Democrat attorney general to develop new rules which govern all manner of behavior of law enforcement officers.

 

This bill allows the AG to collect attorney fees from the county wherein he prosecuted a law enforcement officer. Tens of thousands of dollars in attorney fees (OUR tax money) paid to the state would, in smaller counties, shut down that sheriff’s office leaving the residents will no protection for a period of time. Then, the county’s deep state could appoint a sheriff of their liking SEE HB 1399 ABOVE.

 

DEMOCRATS’ OBSESSION TO CONTROL

 

The effort to remove the voice of the voter from the oversight of the Office of Sheriff is a bold one, and deserves an answer as to why it is even suggested. There are NO problems that a change like this would remedy. There is no reason to take authority away from voters OTHER THAN Democrat’s obsession to control everyone and everything in Americans’ lives.As with every other elected county official, the sheriff is elected by a vote of the people, just the same as judges, prosecutors, commissioners, treasurers, assessors, auditors, and coroners: 39 counties, 39 sets of elected officials here in Washington State. By law, the sheriff is the chief executive officer and conservator of the peace of the county. (RCW 36.28.010) This means that the sheriff carries the authority of the state and of his/her county’s citizens to keep the peace and is the highest ranking officer in the executive branch of county government.

 

Last year Democrats tried to weaken the sheriff’s authority through a non-citizen board which would allow a sheriff to be decertified and removed from office by people other than their own electorate. Now, they are at it again. Why? Because the sheriff enjoys a measure of voice within the community that is not always appreciated by other officials. Not so much the citizens that they serve, but other officials, some elected, some not. That is, the Deep State within the county or state.

 

The people have always been able to remove a sheriff (or any other elected official) through the process of recall or vote, and that’s the way it happens. Let’s leave the future of ALL elected officials in the hands of the voters.

 

3. Outlawing Elected Sheriffs In Washington.  You Must Stop HB 1399

 

By Diane L. Gruber  Feb 28, 2025

 

Thurston County’s biggest city is Olympia, Washington State’s capitol.

 

Elected sheriffs are more independent and more effectively represent, and understand, the values of the people in their counties than sheriffs appointed by Washington’s governor or some other political body. A bill sitting in a Washington State House committee, HB1399, could change the entire landscape of the election process for county sheriffs and replace them with appointed sheriffs who are accountable only to politicians, not to We The People. You can tell your two state representatives and your state senator to vote “NO” by clicking on this link.

 

A careful reading of this 20 page bill reveals many troubling ways our overlords in Olympia will prevent the voters of each county from electing the sheriff of their choice. I will name just three:

 

1) Write-in candidates will no longer allowed. I find this very troubling because, in 2022, Pacific County got rid of a sheriff who was widely disliked for his failure to provide effective policing in many areas of the county & his lackadaisical attitude, and elected the write-in, Daniel Garcia, with 61% of the vote. The public is extremely happy with him. This bill is sneaky. It does not outlaw write-in candidates. That would be too honest. The public might notice. They merely put so many pre-filing requirements in place that a would-be candidate would need to start the pre-filing process at least a year in advance, maybe longer. The pre-filing time frame will be completely controlled by our overlords in Olympia. See Sections 8 and 10 of HB 1399.

 

2) When the sheriff’s position is vacant (will all the new rules, there will be more vacancies), the county commissioners will appoint the sheriff. See Section 9 of HB 1399. [NOTE: Left-leaning county commissioners dislike ELECTED sheriffs.] The Democrats wanted to give the power to appoint all sheriffs to the governor, but they knew there would be an uproar from We The People, so this is the next best thing in their minds. Chip, chip, chipping away at the county voters’ right to choose their sheriff, one bill at a time.

 

3) Section 8 further narrows the pool of candidates We The People will be allowed to elect as our county sheriff. It requires candidates to have “at least two years regular, uninterrupted, full-time law enforcement agency employment involving enforcement responsibilities with a government law enforcement agency.” Let’s think about that for a minute: In the bigger counties the sheriff’s duties are managerial, not patrolling. In other words, although he/she may carry a gun, they don’t it and don’t arrest people. Voters elect sheriffs from the pool of neighbors whom they trust. They may or may not meet the “two year” requirement. Keep in mind, our overlords in Olympia will interpret this requirement, not the voters. For example, what if the candidate has five years of experience, but that was 10 years ago?

 

The legislative summary of the bill, sponsored by Democrats, can be found here.

FRANKLIN COUNTY SHERIFF AGREES WITH THURSTON COUNTY SHERIFF

 

DEMOCRAT ESTABLISHMENT HATES SHERIFFS

“In an era where government overreach, especially in Blue Jurisdictions, seems to grow by the day, the idea of abolishing elected sheriffs and replacing them with a centralized state controlled authoritarian police force should set off alarm bells for anyone who values local control, accountability, and personal freedoms. The sheriff is one of the last remaining law enforcement officials who answer directly to the people, this The Left hates. Taking that away and handing control to an unelected bureaucratic force isn’t just a bad idea, it’s a dangerous one.

 

Right now, sheriffs serve at the pleasure of the voters in their county. If they fail to protect their communities, abuse their power, or push policies that the people reject, they can be voted out. That’s how democracy is supposed to work. But imagine if, instead, every county’s law enforcement was dictated by a single, centralized force, answering not to the people, but to politicians in far-off offices.

 

Would a bureaucrat in a state capital really understand the needs of a rural farming community the same way a local sheriff would? Would a one-size-fits-all approach to policing work in both small towns and major cities? Of course not. When decision-making is centralized, communities lose their ability to shape how they are policed. And once that power is gone, it’s nearly impossible to get back.” Author unknown.

 

HITLER MOVED POLICE TO OTHER CITIES

 

Adolf Hitler knew that it would be harder for his police forces to arrest, abuse, stuff into cattle cars, et al, people they knew. That is human nature. Therefore, he moved the Berlin police to Munich, the Munich police to Heidelberg, etc.

 

“History offers countless examples of governments using centralized police forces to suppress dissent. When law enforcement is controlled at the local level, there are natural checks and balances—different communities can push back against unjust laws or policies. But when all policing is concentrated in a single authority, that power becomes ripe for abuse.

 

Think about it: If sheriffs had been replaced with a nationalized police force decades ago, how much easier would it have been for the government to silence civil rights activists, union organizers, or political opponents? The more centralized law enforcement becomes, the easier it is for those in power to use it as a weapon against the people.

 

There’s a reason why local law enforcement tends to work better than an outside force parachuting in. Sheriffs live in the same communities they serve. They shop at the same stores, send their kids to the same schools, and attend the same town meetings as their constituents. This connection fosters trust, and trust is essential for effective policing.

 

Under a centralized system, officers would be deployed wherever the government sees fit, with little to no personal connection to the people they’re tasked with protecting. When law enforcement becomes detached from the community, it stops being a service and starts being an occupying force. That’s not policing, that’s control.

 

The United States has had elected sheriffs for centuries, and the system works because it allows for direct democracy in law enforcement. If reform is needed in certain areas, that’s a conversation worth having, but scrapping the whole system in favor of centralized control? That’s a recipe for disaster.

 

Once law enforcement is taken out of local hands and placed under a centralized authority, it will never be given back. The best way to keep law enforcement accountable, responsive, and in touch with the needs of the people is to keep it local. America doesn’t need more government control it needs more community control. Keeping sheriffs elected and local is the best way to ensure that happens.” Author unknown

 

DECERTIFYING SHERIFFS

 

During the 2024 legislative session Democrats introduced a bill which would have allowed the governor to decertify elected sheriffs. It did not get out of committee. Democrats had planned to file it again during the 2025 legislative session, but filed HB 1399 instead. The details can be found in this article:

4. Washington State’s Plan To Decertify Elected Sheriffs

 

 

By Diane L. Gruber  Jan 02, 2025 

 

The State of Washington has been run by, and ruined by, Democrat politicians for decades. When the Antifa/BLM riots took over Seattle in 2020, the Democrat mayor and the Democrat governor cheered them on for months. In the four years since, lawmakers have pushed ever more bills to handcuff police and sheriffs to prevent them from protecting their communities against both violent and non-violent offenders. One attribute of The Left has always been their dislike of the electoral process. They don’t want Americans voting for their leaders, if those leaders believe in the Bill of Rights. They are forever scheming for ways to disenfranchise Americans. And they hold a special disdain for sheriffs because they protect We The People from oppressive government. SEE LINK TO ARTICLE BELOW

 

DE-CERTIFYING ELECTED SHERIFFS

 

Washington citizens and constitutionally elected sheriffs are gearing up for the battle ahead in the 2025 legislative session to protect the rights of voters to decide if their sheriff is fit for duty or not. As usual, Washington Democrats believe they know better than the voters, so they want to give State overlords the authority to de-certify YOUR constitutionally elected sheriff.

 

One of the methods Democrat politicians and anti-police organizations are looking to in their efforts to decrease safety and increase crime is HB 2027. This bill was introduced during the 2024 legislative session, but did not get out of committee. It is expected to be re-introduced in the 2025 session, and Washington’s constitutionally-elected sheriffs are nervous. Black Lives Matter Seattle King County and the (anti-police) organization named The Washington Coalition for Police Accountability (WCPA) are promoting this bill.

 

If passed, this bill would allow the State to decertify any of the thirty-eight^ constitutionally elected sheriffs in the State of Washington, thus disenfranchising the voters of that county. Bob Ferguson, the long time attorney general, will be sworn in as governor on January 15th. He does not like constitutionally elected sheriffs and will certainly sign this bill of it passes out of the legislature. It will be Governor Ferguson, not the voters, who ultimately decides whether an elected sheriff is “fit for duty.

 

“With this bill, certification, training and background checks for elected sheriffs will be the ruse by which the State will wipe out the votes, county by county, and install Ferguson’s choice as sheriff. He will start with those sheriff who consider themselves Constitutional Sheriffs. SEE DEFINITION IN ARTICLE BELOW

 

RCW 36.28.010 and RCW 36.28.011 defines the duties and limitations of an elected sheriff, which does not include oversight by the governor. 

 

5. What Is A Constitutional Sheriff And Why Do YOU Need One?

 

 

By Diane L. Gruber  Dec 29, 2024 

 

The difference between a Constitutional sheriff and a non-Constitutional sheriff is easy to discern. A Constitutional sheriff will not obey any laws, rules, regulations or edicts that are in violation of either the US Constitution, including the Bill of Rights, or the state’s constitution. A sheriff that does not respect his residents’ constitutional rights will obey all statutes, rules, regulations and edicts signed by politicians & bureaucrats. He/she will not do any research to determine if his/her actions are constitutional, instead will merely take marching orders from his/her government overlords.

 

COVID TYRANNY AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL SHERIFFS

 

During the Covid lockdown, if your sheriff arrested people because they attended church services, he/she is NOT a Constitutional sheriff. One does not need to be a Constitutional scholar to recognize that no politician or bureaucrat has the authority to wipe out one’s First Amendment right to freely exercise his/her religion.

 

If your sheriff sent deputies to your house because you had “too many guests” in violation of the governor’s or mayor’s or county commissioner’s unconstitutional mandate against private gatherings, he/she is NOT a Constitutional sheriff. Neither the governor nor the mayor nor the county commission nor any politician or bureaucrat has the right to interfere with YOUR right of association (to associate with whomever, whenever, wherever, however you choose) which is guaranteed by the First Amendment: “the right of the people peaceably to assemble.

 

”DO YOU NEED MORE EXAMPLES?

 

Do you get the point? Even if your state’s lawmakers have passed a bill and your governor has signed it, if any part of it violates any part of our US Constitution, especially our precious Bill of Rights, or your state’s constitution, a Constitutional sheriff will not enforce it.

 

The Bluer your state or your city, the more you need the protections afforded by a Constitutional sheriff. The further Left a politician or bureaucrat is, the less respect they have for constitutional rights and for YOU, the ordinary citizen and, thus, you have greater need for a Constitutional sheriff.

 

Washington Attorney General and Democrat Governor-Elect Bob Ferguson does not see the Bill of Rights as an obstacle to his tyranny. His AG office has written a number of bills during his 12-year tenure which, if passed, chip, chip, chip away at Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Press, Freedom of Assembly and Freedom of Religion. Some were passed and signed by Marxist Governor Inslee. An article about one of the most troubling laws can be found linked at the end of this article. It becomes effective July 1, 2025, so all Washingtonians will soon need a Constitutional sheriff.

 

Sheriff Garcia has stated that he will not harass nor arrest any person the AG Office claims is in violation of this new, unconstitutional statute. THIS is why Democrats, RINOs and Washington’s Deep State have to get rid of him!

 

SHERIFF DANIEL GARCIA, PACIFIC COUNTY, WASHINGTON

 

Daniel Garcia was elected as a write-in candidate in November, 2022, with over 61% of the vote, and took office January 1, 2023. He has made no bones about his respect for both the US Constitution and the Washington State Constitution. He has publicly stated many times that, if a statute, rule, regulation or mandate conflicts with either constitution, he will not enforce it. Indeed, the first time I organized and emceed the Peninsula Patriots’ Legislators’ Town Hall (July 2023), Garcia attended and explained to the audience the duties of a Constitutional sheriff.

 

Garcia views one of his roles as protector of the county’s 27,000 residents, standing between them and government tyranny. Reminding me of how the DC Swamp treated Trump 45, county government snakes have been spying on, cataloguing and undermining Sheriff Garcia’s every move, as he continues to make improvements to every aspect of the sheriff’s office and duties. Indeed, one of them leaks lies and half-truths to the two local newspapers on a regular basis in order to undermine Sheriff Garcia. Sounds familiar, doesn’t it?

 

Sheriff Garcia is extremely popular with county residents for many reasons. One reason is because he seeks out our opinions and listens to us. Another reason is because he reinstated patrols in certain areas of the county where they have not existed for years. His entire staff supports him because he has made so many improvements and because he respects them & their ideas. He has increased training, including firearms training. Sheriff Garcia started a cold case unit. To date, they have solved FIVE cold murder cases, one dating back to July 2015.

 

CHIP, CHIP, CHIPPING AWAY  

 

Defunding Garcia is just one step in Ferguson’s and Democrats’ long range plans to defund all elected sheriffs in Washington State and replace them with Ferguson’s hand-picked lackeys.

 

The jail was in disrepair for years, and the two previous sheriffs made no attempt to upgrade it. Jail conditions were not only dangerous for inmates (some of the cell doors were hard to unlock), it was dangerous for jail staff, as well. Sheriff Garcia applied for and received a $450,000 remodeling grant from the State of Washington. Construction will soon be completed.

 

Sheriff Garcia terminated the previous head jailer and replaced him with Commander Inspector Mike Parker (seen in photo above) who recently received an award because his quick action saved an inmate from committing suicide. The county overlords, with no notice to the public and only eight days notice to Sheriff Garcia, issued Parker his severance packet because the head county overlord^ is taking over jail operations and hiring a friend to manage it.

 

DEFUNDING OUR CONSTITUTIONAL SHERIFF

 

At a county commissioners’ meeting the day after Christmas the head overlord^ recommended to the three elected commissioners, two Democrats and one RINO, that jail management be transferred five days later, on January 1, 2025. The very small meeting room was packed, standing room only because the commissioners had removed about one-third of the chairs and blocked that space with tables.

 

This writer, who spoke at the meeting, counted over 80 in-person attendees. In addition, 150 residents attended via Zoom. Another one thousand or so watched the meeting on Facebook. Of the 50 or so who made public comments, ONLY ONE approved of taking jail management away from Sheriff Garcia. With a middle finger to Pacific County residents, all three commissioners voted to take yet another part of his authority away from our Constitutional sheriff.

 

Stay tuned. As I write this, county residents are gathering to challenge this Marxist transfer of responsibilities from an elected, accountable official to an unelected, unaccountable county overlord. I will write further about Ferguson’s long range plans to defund elected sheriffs and replace them with lackeys he appoints. Also, I will keep my readers updated on the county residents’ revolt against our overlords’ disenfranchisement of voters.

 

^Commissioners Olsen and Tobin were re-elected in November without telling voters of their plans to further undermine their elected sheriff. Tobin’s challenger was just 700 votes short of beating him. I can’t help but think she might have won that seat had the truth emerged.

 

6. Defunding Constitutional Sheriffs: Another Scheme To Disenfranchise Voters

 

Long Beach Peninsula, Washington: Cape Disappointment at the mouth of the Columbia River as it empties into the Pacific Ocean.

 

By Diane L. Gruber  Dec 30, 2024

 

My Dear Subscribers: I know most of you do not reside in the State of Washington. Nevertheless, you may want to learn how the Marxists who own this state are cleverly defunding elected sheriffs with the aim of eventually replacing most or all of them with lackeys appointed by the governor. You will thus be forewarned should YOUR state/county overlords copying this scheme.

 

Diane To Washingtonians: Below is a three page document which was drafted by and signed by Pacific County’s highest paid overlord, County Administrative Officer Paul Plakinger. Pacific County’s three commissioners bowed to his lust for more power and authority (he will oversee the new agency) by transferring jail services, AND the funding therefor, from the ELECTED Sheriff’s office to a newly created, more expensive, Department of Corrections’ Pacific County Jail Services. NOTE: As you can no doubt see, it took months to research and prepare these documents, while their plans were hidden from We The People.

 

ONGOING SERIES OF ARTICLES

 

This is the second in a series of articles about what is happening in Pacific County, Washington, a county of 27,000 at the mouth of the mighty Columbia River where it empties into the Pacific Ocean. Indeed, Lewis & Clark arrived here November 18, 1805. To catch up with the increased tyranny that slapped residents across the face just days ago, you may want to read “What Is A Constitutional Sheriff, And Why Do YOU Need One.”

 

The difference between a Constitutional sheriff and a non-Constitutional sheriff is easy to discern. A Constitutional sheriff will not obey any laws, rules, regulations or edicts that are in violation of either the US Constitution, including the Bill of Rights, or the state’s constitution. A sheriff that does not respect his residents’ constitutional rights will obey all statutes, rules, regulations and edicts signed by politicians & bureaucrats. He/she will not do any research to determine if his/her actions are constitutional, instead will merely take marching orders from state or county overlords.

 

COUNTY OVERLORDS UNDERMINE NEW SHERIFF

 

Beginning the moment Sheriff Daniel Garcia, a write-in candidate, was elected (November 2022) with 61% of the vote, Pacific County “overlords,” Democrats and RINOs all, have been plotting to undermine his authority. Shortly after he was sworn in on January 1, 2023, they started the process of removing 911 Dispatch services, and the funding therefor, from the sheriff’s office, where it had been since its inception decades ago. They finalized that move in 2023.

 

Without notice to the public, and with only an eight-day notice to Sheriff Garcia, the county commissioners met the day after Christmas. The head overlord, County Administrative Officer, recommended to the three elected commissioners, two Democrats and one RINO, that jail management be transferred five days later, on January 1, 2025. All three voted “yes” as they read from prepared remarks, thus disenfranchising county voters and ignoring the huge outcry against this transfer.

 

WE THE PEOPLE WON’T TAKE THIS LYING DOWNWe The People had voted for Daniel Garcia to manage all the offices which had been managed by the previous sheriff. As this article goes to press, several groups of county residents are in the process, through attorneys, of determining how to stop and/or reverse this transfer. Stay tuned.

 

^Commissioners Olsen and Tobin were re-elected in November without telling voters of their plans to further undermine their elected sheriff. Tobin’s challenger was just 700 votes short of beating him. I can’t help but think she might have won that seat had the truth emerged. 

 

7. Bill Pending: ARMED Illegal Aliens Policing AMERICANS In Washington State

 

 

 

By Diane Gruber JAN 26

 

Muslim police officers are especially troubling. Their religion teaches them that all non-Muslims are inferior and that Muslims are free to abuse them in any way they see fit.

 

Political observers in the State of Washington think this bill, which did not pass last year, will pass this year. There are even more haters in the 2026 Legislature than in last year’s legislature: The Senate has 1 Communist, 29 Democrats and 19 Republicans. The House has 58 Democrats (most of whom are Far, Far Left), and 39 Republicans. At the same time that Democrats are voting to make foreign nationals police officers, they are trying to decertify sheriffs who are Americans. SEE ARTICLES BELOW:

 

FOREIGNERS POLICING AMERICANS

 

The Democrats who own this state were not happy with just giving illegal aliens the right to vote and the right to carry firearms, which they did during the 2024 Legislative Session (SEE ARTICLE BELOW). And they aren’t happy with just decertifying ELECTED sheriffs (SEE ARTICLES BELOW).

 

Before you watch this short video, which explains very clearly Democrats’ reasoning for hiring foreigners as POLICE OFFICERS in Washington State, allow me to point out an accept of human nature. Hitler recognized that police in Germany would be reluctant to arrest their Jewish neighbors, et al, and put them in cattle cars headed to the concentration camps. It is harder to abuse someone you know than someone you don’t know. That is human nature. So, Hitler transferred the Munich policemen to Berlin and the Berlin policemen to Heidelberg and so on. This technique in policing was quite effective in achieving the Fuhrer’s goals, was it not?

 

 

8. It Is Now Illegal To Make Illegals Feel Uncomfortable

 

 

Diane L. GruberApr 08, 2024

 

As we import ever more illegals into Sanctuary Washington State, Democrats want to be sure they are comfortable. Giving them free Obamacare, free housing, free food, free everything is not enough! We need to give them special status. How do we do that? During the 2024 legislative session we gave them Super Citizen status by allowing them to work, but not pay into Social Security. And to ensure that Americans don’t hurt their feelings we enacted a new law during the same session that wipes out First Amendment Rights for Americans.

 

Last month Washington’s Marxist Governor signed an unconstitutional bill which I quickly wrote about because I wanted to warn both Washingtonians and others. [Oregonians & Californians need to keep an eye on their legislatures. We call these three states COW because they often copy each others’ tyrannical ideas.] I have now had time to ruminate over the new law and believe it to be more Orwellian than it seemed at first glance. I will start by apologizing that I missed a key last minute change to the bill. The Democrats who sponsored the bill removed the $2000 reward a whiner would receive from the taxpayers for turning in an acquaintance or stranger. It was too controversial and too expensive, they claimed.

 

Too controversial? Too Expensive? But, the rest of this Soviet-style, Chinese Social Credit Score-type, unconstitutional bill was just fine? Really? The Left never accepts defeat. They will eventually find a way to reward haters with our tax dollars and/or money confiscated from the target. After all, one gets what they pay for and The Left wants & needs ever more haters & faux victims to feed the grievance industry.

 

NEW LAW ESTABLISHES A “PROTECTED CLASS

 

”This new statute creates & defines a “protected class.” These people are so special that the state must protect their feelings: “race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender expression or identity, or mental, physical, or sensory disability.” National origin and ancestry includes, of course, illegals. The bill defines a “bias incident” as a non-protected person’s “hostile expression of animus” toward a person in the “protected class.

 

”Since this bill does not define the term “hostile expression of animus,” it is left to the Attorney General’s office to define it. Currently, that overlord is Democrat Bob Ferguson, who is running for governor. He drafted and promoted a failed bill in both the 2023 & 2024 legislative sessions which would throw Conservatives, Christians, Republicans and Trump supporters into deprogramming camps. We can only assume that Bob will interpret this new term to include a frown on the face of a Conservative, Christian, Republican and/or Trump supporter, especially if he/she is “white,” while in the presence of a “protected person.

 

”Bob wants to terrorize Americans and to drive a wedge between neighbors, friends, co-workers, et al who, when the word gets out about this new law, will be afraid to talk to each other. Indeed, as I write this article, in my mind’s eye I am envisioning a Liberal who lives on my street. She has screamed at me in the distant past* because I made a remark about a presidential policy. This law makes her a “protected person.” I am a “non-protected” person. If I call her a “jackass,” I will wind up on The List.

 

Time to gas up the U-Haul.

 

“WRONG SPEAK” LIST OF AMERICANS

 

This new statute clearly states that a “hostile expression of animus” is not a crime that can be prosecuted in court. So, why does the bill require local law enforcement to get involved? To terrorize Americans? I believe the main reason for this bill is to allow the State of Washington to create a list of Americans which can be used against them in a multitude of ways. When a person applies for a government job, will that agency first check The List before hiring? When applying for an electrician’s license will the applicant be denied because he/she is on The List? Will a person on The List be denied Section 8 Housing even though he/she qualifies? My mind goes wild with all the possibilities how The List could be used and abused.

 

Imagine this:

 

The local sheriff’s deputy^ shows up at your home to question you about a “bias incident” you allegedly committed. The statute prohibits him from telling you who reported you. You stand there with a dumb look on your face because you don’t have a clue what he is talking about. The deputy is not allowed to answer any questions that may give away who the “Karen” is who called the hotline. Since Karen did not scream at you “BIAS INCIDENT! BIAS INCIDENT!” at the time you “wrongspoke,” you have no idea when, where, who, what, why or how.

 

You have no way to defend yourself. Your name goes on the state’s The List and remains there until ten years after you die (levity is sorely needed here). If another person turns you in for a different “bias incident” it is anyone’s guess, at this early point in the life of this unconstitutional law, what the Gestapo in the AG’s office will do to you. As I advise everyone if the FBI shows up at your door: When police come to your door, the only words out of your mouth should be “lawyer,” then politely close the door.

 

Since no crime has been committed, the police cannot arrest you; but, your name will be on a The List until voters kick the Marxist bums out, repeal this law and shred The List.

 

TYRANNY STARTS JULY 1, 2025

 

The new law requires the Attorney General’s office to establish a pilot hotline in three counties by July 1, 2025, and in every county by January 1, 2027. AG Bob Ferguson made it clear during this PBS interview that he hates Conservatives, Republicans, Trump supporters and others. No doubt, he is hard at work as I write this to interpret this statute in the most fascist, unconstitutional way his weasley little brain can conjure up.

 

The Progressives & Marxists who sponsored this bill say it is intended to help “victims of hate crimes” before a crime even happens. Say what? In reality, would create a database of innocent Americans, undermine legitimate criminal investigations, and freeze, not just chill, speech & the press in Washington State. People will stop talking to others and writing to others except very close friends & relatives, for fear a Karen will report them to Washington’s version of the Gestapo. And what about posts on social media?

 

What about public meetings, such city council meetings or school board meetings or county commissioner meetings? Both elected officials and the public will not be able to speak freely for fear someone will call the “bias hotline.” As I read the bill, I see nothing in it that prohibits a third party from calling the hotline to complain that he/she heard a “non-protected” person criticize a “protected” person.

 

And I can’t even imagine what this will do to the The Press in the State of Washington. I see nothing in this new law that excludes writers, editors, columnists, reporters from being targeted.

 

STATS SHOW FEW “HATE CRIMES”

 

This law is not needed because Washington State has virtually no “hate crimes” among a population of 7.7 million: police reported 590 hate crimes to the FBI for 2022, of which 63% were related to race, ethnicity or ancestry, while 18% were related to sexual orientation and 10% were related to religion.. In 2021 the number was 651. Although Black Lives Matter riots destroyed downtown Seattle in 2020 there were only 462 reported “hate crimes.

 

”Yes, this statute violates at least the following constitutional rights: 1) The right to confront your accuser; 2) Freedom of Speech; 3) Freedom of Thought, which is implied in the First Amendment; 4) Freedom of Religion; 5) Freedom of the Press, to name a few that quickly come to mind. Once it works its way up to the US Supreme Court it will be outlawed. In the meantime, how many “notches on their Gestapo gun belts” will the Karens of Washington State rack up?
Bob Ferguson loves this bill! Indeed, he is bitterly disappointed that an even worse bill he drafted and found a sponsor for did not make it out of committee these last two legislative sessions. Here is the article I wrote recently about that (failed) bill:

9. Democrats Create “Super Citizens”

 

 

Diane L. Gruber  Feb 06, 2024

 

A “super citizen” is someone who does not have to follow the law (may even be protected by the government), is given benefits of all kinds that ordinary citizens don’t enjoy, and is not required to provide any benefit to our nation or society. Yes there are, currently, many Americans who are super citizens. At this point, Hunter Biden is the most protected of all super citizens.* But, for purposes of this discussion, we will be highlighting a new kind of super citizen: Biden’s Guests, otherwise known as illegal aliens. 

 

DEMOCRATS USE AMERICANS’ MONEY TO CREATE SUPER CITIZENS

 

Super Citizen Example No. One:

The most recent illegals to be turned into super citizens are the four young thugs who were arrested for mercilessly stomping, kicking and beating, along other illegals, two NYC police officers, sending them to the hospital. So important were these illegals that Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg took a personal interest in their case and released them within hours, without bail. Now, Bragg is pretending to be hunting for them in California. How did they get clear across the country? On public transportation with a free pass paid for with our tax dollars, of course! As you can see from the photo above, this thug knows he is an invincible super citizen and wants us poor dummkopfs who follow the law to know it.Super

 

Citizen Example No. Two:

 

Americans living in border towns, including pregnant women, are denied access to local health care because illegals are occupying all the hospital beds. Americans need to drive hundreds of miles north in order to receive medical care.

 

Super Citizen Example No. Three:

 

Illegals who are processed at the border, not to be confused with Biden’s Guests who choose to sneak across avoiding Border Patrol’s 28 processing centers, are given “arrest papers,” often using false names, which allow them to ride free on public transportation at the expense of American taxpayers. Indeed, some are even given chauffeurs to take them to the city of their choice. Note: Border Patrol is not allowed to “vet” illegals, even when lifting their shirts would reveal whether an illegal is a member of MS-13. Super citizens are not vetted by TSA at the airports, either. They just sashay right past the TSA waiting line, while Americans are subjected to all manner of indignities.

 

Super Citizen Example No. Four:

 

Illegals are driving scooters, cars and other kinds of vehicles on public streets, roads, highways & freeways without drivers’ licenses and without insurance. And increasing numbers are driving drunk. Last week House Republicans passed a bill requiring illegals convicted of drunk driving to be eligible for deportation. [Say what? Aren’t ALL illegals eligible for deportation?] One hundred & fifty Democrats voted to allow drunk illegals to continue driving. American drunks don’t have that privilege, except for Hunter. Since Democrats own the Senate, the bill will die there.

 

Super Citizen Example No. Five:

 

Americans are being evicted, in order to provide housing for illegals: 1) High School students are denied access to their school building because Democrats house illegals there; 2) Elderly Americans, including veterans, are being evicted from their assisted living facilities because Democrat officials are using Americans’ tax money to house illegals there; and 3) Democrats are closing public recreation centers to Americans so that illegals can live there.

 

Super Citizen Example No. Six:

 

Currently, eleven municipalities in Maryland, and two Vermont cities permit non-citizens to vote in local elections. Democrats in Connecticut are pushing a bill to give illegal aliens the right to vote in all state and local elections, thus elevating them above some Americans, such as felons. In 2021, New York City passed a law allowing non-citizen voters at the local level, but the law was struck down by a judge. Oakland, California, is just one city that allows non-citizen parents of school children to vote for School Board Director. Other non-citizen suffrage proposals are cropping up in cities across the country, all promoted by Democrats.

 

Super Citizen Example No. Seven:

 

When was the last time Americans received “Covid money?” Washington State is taking 340 million in undistributed Covid money, received from federal tax payers three years ago, and giving it to the illegals they drove & flew into the state. This, at a time when “American food bank eaters” has never been higher.

 

Super Citizen Example No. Eight:

 

Americans’ health insurance premiums have skyrocketed in order to provide Cadillac health care to illegals who do not pay premiums. Federal law requires hospitals to provide care to anyone who shows up in the Emergency Room, including Biden’s Guest who just arrived. In addition, some states (California & Washington are two examples) automatically sign up illegals for Medicaid upon arrival. Currently, about 22 million Americans are uninsured.

 

These examples of how Democrats are placing Biden’s Guests ahead of Americans only scratch the surface.

Who Is Paying For Aliens’ Food, Shelter, Cellphones, Clothes?  YOU ARE!!!

 

                          Eagle Pass, Texas, December 19, 2023

 

 

From Diane L. Gruber’s America’s First Re-Ignited