Just Answer The Question

By Karen Schumacher

This government does everything it can to hide and avoid answering what the true goals are and at what cost to Americans.

Being carbon neutral to halt climate change is supposed to bring great benefit to the masses.  But the truth is, it has always been a ploy to enhance global corporate profits, devastate everyone into equal poverty, and expand a technocratic state that provides constant control over humanity.

To validate this as only a ruse to destroy capitalism,  Christiana Figueres herself stated in 2017, ““This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time, to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years, since the Industrial Revolution.”

Louisiana Senator John Kennedy has a unique way in which to bring the truth to the forefront with humor.  Last year, in this exchange with Deputy Energy Secretary David Turk, he brought to the front how American dollars are being wasted to achieve something that does not exist.  Turk’s inability to answer Sen. Kennedy’s simple questions are telling of just how much of the carbon neutral agenda is a scam.  One can only grin as he squirms.

Carbon neutral, not to be confused with net zero, means removing as much carbon dioxide from the atmosphere as it is emitting, whereas net zero means removing as much greenhouse gas emissions as it is producing.  Changes in corporate practices for carbon neutral and net zero technology are generating trillions of dollars towards the collapse of capitalism, as they are government led “investments” in partnerships with corporations.

Mr. Turk failed to answer the question regarding cost but some estimates start at $50 trillion as Sen. Kennedy referenced, to $91 trillion per the World Economic Forum (WEF), and as high as $125 trillion.  To add an insult to these numbers, WEF would also like to throw in a carbon tax.

Net zero is the White House target for 2050 and is outlined in this document.  The claim is to limit warming to 1.5 degree Celsius, but from what temperature?  And where?  However, the document does admit to this deception by acknowledging the goals of creating an “equitable economy” (pg 1), “spur investments that modernize the American economy” (pg 2), and the need to “retool the global energy economy.”  It’s all about transforming the economy.

Since energy runs everything, every sector will be transformed.  Agriculture through AI, transportation infrastructure with electric vehicles and high speed rail, housing, all the while training a workforce for this technology (pgs. 3, 5, 12).  On page 8 it also reiterates how non-governmental organizations “support the overall transition of the U.S. economy.”  Oh joy, it also states this transition must “generate new regulations, direct investment, and programs at all levels of government” (pg 13).  So much for state sovereignty.  If there are questions as to why cows and gas stoves have been targeted, the answer is in this document.

Government “invests,” or rather pays corporations to create this technology that forever changes the free market concept, with resulting corporate wealth.  It is no wonder Mr. Turk evaded answering the questions.