SHARE

Government nor courts are equipped to mandate medical treatment

Not one of these government “authorities” can prove that not being injected puts the rest of the nation at risk. Not one. There’s too much evidence to the contrary.

The courts are flooded with lawsuits to both block government from imposing medical mandates and, on the flipside, to allow government to enforce medical mandates. The problem is that neither the government nor the courts have sufficient power or medical expertise to coerce individuals to receive treatment, invasive or otherwise.

Vaccine mandates are being tossed out in one courtroom and being reinstated in another, all dependent on the political leanings of the jurists who have no medical knowledge on which to hang their rulings.

Nothing in the Constitution allows for any officeholder, elected or appointed, to make personal choices for citizens

In the same vein, government agencies guided by ideology are creating and applying rules across the board with disregard for health consequences.

That any executive government agency, legislative or judicial body assumes it can override individuals’ health prerogatives is untenable as outside their jurisdiction. The discrimination is now against individuals who invoke their right to rely on natural immunity against what can amount to a virulent cold virus.

Nothing in the Constitution allows for any officeholder, elected or appointed, to make personal choices for citizens, whether it’s forcing marriage, impregnation, labor, travel or healthcare options without their consent as was attempted with Obamacare. Was Congress and the presidency attempting to lay the framework to compel vaccines the same way it attempted to mandate purchasing health insurance?

As much as medical doctors are being touted as experts on human health, and no doubt they have learned much during their years of training and experience, still, they have no mandate to pressure or compel individuals to receive treatments, surgeries or other invasive therapies (including oral) without the individual’s consent.

No amount of scientific studies can predict the reaction of any individual to treatments or vaccines, nor do any scientists, M.D.s, Ph.D.’s or other so-called experts in the private or public sector have any discretion to command individuals’ participation. Neither are medical personnel, legislators or judiciary authorized to refuse therapeutics to patients, particularly in light of the “Right to Try” act of President Trump that green-lighted the use of experimental or off-label application of drugs and treatments that are undergoing studies, which includes Ivermectin.

The much-trotted out argument of compelling public interest that the mandates for vaccination, masking, social distancing, quarantining and possible forced internment to protect the populace from itself doesn’t hold water. Where the only thing provable about the “novel coronavirus” is that the statistics collected on deaths and new cases are inflated by hundreds of thousands due to intentional reporting manipulation by government agencies.

Fatalities from Covid have been and continue to be over-reported after the CDC issued new requirements pressuring health professionals to include “Covid-19” as cause of death on the majority of death certificates submitted from early in 2020. For over a year, administering admittedly flawed PCR tests that were not designed to specifically identify viruses continued and is still being used to inflate the positive case count.

These facts counter any legal claim that there is an ongoing danger to the public, and government agencies cannot reasonably assert compelling interest to enforce vaccine mandates and passports. Also negating the argument of compelling public interest is that the waves of “breakout” cases are related to fully vaccinated individuals as being the majority of those testing positive and being admitted to hospitals for care.

No administrator, legislator or jurist has the power to compel an individual to cross a street, let alone roll up their sleeve for a compulsory inoculation that could cost them their life

What is being witnessed is how servants of the People are taking it upon themselves to command constituents’ actions, forcing them to acquiesce to receiving what could be a lethal injection, especially to younger people succumbing to myocarditis, pericarditis, blood clots, aneurysms and, in some instances, sudden death.

No administrator, legislator or jurist has the power to compel an individual to cross a street, let alone roll up their sleeve for a compulsory inoculation that could cost them their life. No barrage of fearmongering from the White House that there will be a “winter of severe illness and death” for the unvaccinated can change the fact that the individuals filling hospital beds are mostly those fully vaccinated. Redefining “unvaccinated” to include everyone who is shy of 14 days since inoculation or, now, receiving a booster, will not reverse the optics that the fully vaccinated are testing positive and sweeping cruise ships with cases (vaccine passports are required to board).

The charge that the vaccines can be fatal is bolstered by thousands of deaths where the injected sera are implicated. VAERS and EudraVigilance (EU) have recorded millions of adverse effects from all the sera combined – Johnson and Johnson (Janssen), Moderna, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, etc. Not one has passed muster in avoiding reactions that have left an unacceptable number of recipients crippled for life or who have died.

One peer-reviewed study that was buried after being published in the New England Journal of Medicine, April 21, 2021, recently resurfaced. A table within the study showed that 82% of the pregnant women in the study lost their babies after injection of the Moderna vaccine. Misreading the data (purposefully?) has led to fact-check sites concluding that this percentage of loss is “false” information.

The individual has sovereignty over his-her body, not the nation, state, county or municipality

This is just one of dozens of studies that are finally coming out long after the FDA issued Emergency Use Authorization of the vaccines. It did not fully approve any of the sera in current use. With the compelling data that is being released, no agency or court can responsibly defend imposing vaccine mandates. Lawfully, there is no jurisdiction under which any legislative, administrative or judicial ruling may coerce individuals to accept medical treatment and it doesn’t matter what their reason for refusal, be it religious objection or simply preferring not to inject or ingest an alien substance into their body.

It takes a mighty effort to twist the Constitution to arrive at a conclusion that the government can force inoculation with a possibly dangerous substance that has no evidence of protecting individuals from a virus that has proven to be less fatal than seasonal flu.

Even were Covid-19 and subsequent manipulated variants more deadly than a pernicious cold that turns into pneumonia, there is no constitutional basis for securing the nation by forcing the population to undergo invasive medical treatment, be it injected or swallowed. The individual has sovereignty over his-her body, not the nation, state, county or municipality.

The Constitution does not provide for the establishment of statutes, executive orders or memoranda that criminalizes decisions regarding personal health. Just the opposite. The Constitution protects the individual from just such governmental interference in their lives.

Our right to refuse invasive, potentially harmful procedures despite trying to color our decisions as injurious to the general public

Despite the obvious, the infestation of attorneys in every corner of government has created the debacle of having to defend one’s God-given rights against the executive, legislative and judicial branches’ institutionalized overreach of power. Not one of them has jurisdiction over the individual’s body.

Legislatures can apply taxes and restrict sales and distribution of cigarettes, alcohol, drugs, foods, etc. but they cannot reject or override our right to refuse invasive, potentially harmful procedures despite trying to color our decisions as injurious to the general public.

The true compelling public interest is allowing each of us, the People, to govern our own health decisions. Not one of these government “authorities” can prove that not being injected puts the rest of the nation at risk. Not one. There’s too much evidence to the contrary.