Report from Olympia | March 28, 2019
A gusher of money, and still it’s not enough
Lack of need does nothing to deter proposals for multi-billion-dollar tax hikes
By Washington Senator Mike Padden
Dear Friends and Neighbors,
This week our legislative session enters the home stretch. What’s clear is that the debate of the next few weeks will be one of the most unusual ever to play out under the Capitol dome. The majority party is determined to enact major tax increases, whether we need them or not – and pretty much all the evidence indicates we don’t.
Seldom has the state been in such a good financial position. Our economy is growing by leaps and bounds. So are the state’s tax collections — over the next two years, we will collect $5 billion more than at present. That’s enough to continue doing everything the state has been doing, meet all legal obligations, and still have a couple of billion dollars left over.
But our urban Puget Sound colleagues want still more. The House majority this week proposed a $53 billion spending plan for the next two years. To use round numbers, that’s a couple billion dollars more than we expect to take in. To pay for it, they propose massive tax increases that would have devastating effect on our economy and our citizens. These proposals include steep hikes in business taxes and a brand-new income tax, setting the state up for a big expansion of government.
The majority party in the Senate is expected to unveil a similar proposal on Friday. Add these taxes to the steep increases in energy costs imposed by other legislation this year and we have a recipe for economic stagnation. This will be the battle of the next few weeks at the state Capitol, right up through our scheduled adjournment April 28. I’ll tell you more about it in this week’s newsletter. If you have a comment or concern about the direction this year’s Legislature is taking, this is the time to make your opinions known. Please do not hesitate to contact me or my staff at our office in Olympia.
Senator Mike Padden
Senate committee revives DUI bill, other measures advance
Tougher sentences for impaired drivers. The Senate Law and Justice Committee has revived a bill I have sponsored that would send more repeat DUI offenders to prison. The bill extends the look-back in DUI cases, allowing courts to consider convictions within the last 15 years when determining sentence. Current law allows only 10. This would make it easier to convict repeat impaired drivers of felonies on their fourth conviction. SB 5299 failed to receive a vote in the Senate before a March 13 deadline, and was technically considered “dead.” However, the committee amended another bill dealing with DUI, HB 1504, to include the longer look-back provision. The committee passed the bill Thursday morning and sent it on to the Ways and Means Committee for further consideration.
Cracking down on human trafficking. A measure I have sponsored that would make it easier for prosecutors to obtain convictions in human trafficking cases involving children is due for a vote today in the House Civil Rights and Judiciary Committee. SB 5885 would create an exemption to the state’s “hearsay” rule for children under 16 for certain sex offenses. This would allow courts to consider statements made outside of court proceedings a courtesy that would reduce trauma for victims of this most reprehensible crime.
Organ transplants for the disabled. A bill that would prohibit discrimination against the disabled for organ transplants cleared the House Health Care and Wellness Committee Wednesday. I sponsored SB 5405 after learning of several high-profile cases in other states in which organ transplants have been denied because the patient is developmentally disabled. The bill would prohibit medical providers from using disability as the sole reason for denial. Although the federal Americans With Disabilities Act also prohibits discrimination, its prohibition is broad and general, and several states have passed bills like this one to ensure discrimination does not occur.
What do you think of the budget debate?
This week we’re asking your opinion on the budget debate before this year’s Legislature. To participate in this online survey, click here or on the question below. We will provide results in a future newsletter.
House proposal would increase state spending 19 percent — and assumes the increase can be sustained in the future.
We’re used to hearing proposals for tax increases from our urban Western Washington colleagues. We hear them every year, come rain or come shine, no matter what shape our economy is in or what promises were made during the preceding election season. What is striking about the proposal made by the House this year is its size — $2.8 billion in new taxes every two years when fully implemented, the biggest tax increase in the history of the state. Equally perplexing is the fact that there is no emergency, no costly court decision, or any other external cause for us to increase spending to this degree. This effort to raise taxes is not about sustaining government, but rather about expanding it, and expanding it substantially.
Of the $5 billion in new money we expect to receive, a big chunk is already spoken for mostly by the overhaul of our school-financing system we approved two years ago. But that leaves about $2 billion we can use for new programs, tax cuts or anything else we might want to do. We can raise even more if we enact a number of efficiency measures identified by our budget staff as much as $1.5 billion. That’s a lot of money. As Rep. Drew Stokesbary, R-Auburn, told the Seattle Times this week, there’s plenty of money available for new priorities: You can easily get to $3 billion by snapping your fingers
- Where the money goes. The signature feature of the House budget is that it dispenses with the usual hand-wringing over tough choices and says yes to just about everything. About 40 percent of the spending increase would go toward higher salaries and benefits for state employees. Some of the social-program spending is important, and we have the money for those items; others might be put off until our next budget, if we do them at all.
- Big tax increases. To pay for this ramp-up in spending, our colleagues are proposing a 20 percent increase in taxes for many businesses, and to please the Seattle activist crowd, substantially higher tax increases for Amazon and Microsoft. They also are proposing an income tax on capital gains. This starter tax that would likely be expanded into a general income tax if the courts approve and would allow the state to take a greater share of people’s personal income into perpetuity. Taxes on real-estate transactions also would be increased.
- Why now? This is the first time in a decade that our colleagues have enjoyed large enough majorities to write a budget without input from our side of the aisle. The pressure for fiscal discipline is off. Many in the majority argue that the people of Washington aren’t paying their fair share, and that making some people pay higher taxes than others would make things more fair. This is about increasing the size of the pie, not redistributing the slices. Nor does regressivity get anything more than lip service, given the fact that this year’s new energy mandates will be hardest on people of low and moderate incomes.
In an editorial last week, the Walla Walla Union-Bulletin observed that the astounding run-up in state revenue has prompted state lawmakers to want to spend, spend, spend raise taxes and spend some more. This makes no sense. They said it, we didn’t.
How much is enough?
In announcing the House budget proposal this week, House Finance Chair Gael Tarleton, D-Seattle, told the press, unfortunately, the post-Great Recession economy has not produced enough revenue to fund our current needs. Really?
- State tax collections have increased $14 billion since 2013.
- State tax collections have outpaced the growth of personal income since the recession ended. Revenue is up 45 percent while the median household income has increased just 22 percent.
- State reserves are at their highest level in history.
This is one of the most astounding rebounds the state has ever seen. It is proof of our success, during five years of Republican control of the Senate, in holding the line on taxes and allowing our economy to grow without interference. We wouldn’t be where we are today if we had enacted some of those heavy-handed proposals for tax increases we heard six years ago.
We’re in Olympia for the duration. If you have a question or concern about state government, please do not hesitate to contact our office. We are here to serve you!
Phone: (360) 786-7606
Street address: 106 Irv Newhouse Building, Capitol Campus, Olympia, WA 98504
Postal address: PO Box 40404, Olympia, WA 98504
Email address: Mike.Padden@leg.wa.gov